Chicago Casino Feasibility Study
- Chicago Casino Feasibility Study Questions
- Chicago Casino Feasibility Study Guides
- Chicago Casino Feasibility Study Guidelines
- Chicago Casino Feasibility Study Guide
None of the five potential sites for a casino in Chicago are “financially feasible” due to the current tax and fee structure in place in the city, a $120,000 study by Union Gaming Analytics for the Illinois Gaming Board has concluded.
The gaming expansion bill signed into law by Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker in July allowed for the establishment of six new land-based casinos, including a major facility in Chicago. While such a facility could potentially become the highest-grossing casino in the state, the study said, high taxes would see it struggle to turn a profit.
The report released today (13 August) said the Chicago facility was not feasible because of a special privilege tax levied on the venue in return for the right to operate a casino in the city.
Read the study by a state-hired consultant that says the proposed tax structure for a Chicago casino is “very onerous” and could fail to attract an investor. Prospects for a Chicago casino took a hit Tuesday after a study found that the state-approved proposal would not be viable because of “very onerous” taxes and that five South and West side sites.
“We would also expect any such proposal to be dependent on either material changes to, or abatement of, the City of Chicago privilege tax of one third of adjusted gross receipts, and potentially the backwards-looking reconciliation fee,” the report said.
“While not all of the tax ‘savings’ would drop to the bottom line in the event the special privilege tax is rescinded, most of it would. In this scenario, and while the casino would certainly allocate some of the savings to, for example, increased marketing efforts, the lack of the special privilege tax would allow a casino to operate with margins broadly in line with the in-state peers.”
The five sites — four on the South side and one on the West side — were selected by the city of Chicago and visited by Union Gaming. The advisory firm reported that none of the sites were ideal, but ultimately ruled that regardless of location, the “the onerous tax and fee structure” in Chicago would be too large an obstacle to overcome.
“The current regulatory construct, namely the highest effective gaming tax and fee structure in the US makes any casino project – regardless of location – generally not financially feasible,” the study said.
According to the study, a casino in Chicago would have to pay a 39% tax on revenue in addition to a 33.3% privilege tax for operating in Chicago, culminating in an effective tax rate of 72%. Union Gaming examined the finances of other casinos in Illinois — which all reported earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization between 19.2% and 26.7% — and in the rest of the US, concluding the privilege tax would be too much to make a Chicago casino profitable.
At the current tax rate, the study concluded that any Chicago casino make at best a 1-2% annual return, which the report stated would be too low a margin for any operator to conduct a successful business.
“We believe a reasonable casino developer would not move forward with a greenfield casino project that has, at best, a low single digit profit margin,” the study said.
The report added that even a casino structured to make a profit from non-gaming amenities would still be unlikely to make more than, “a few pennies on the dollar” and that a casino with these profit margins would be unlikely to obtaining financing.
The report did, however, state that a city-owned casino may be a possible solution.
The gaming expansion bill will also allow legal sports betting in Illinois, but the state gaming commission still needs to create a regulatory framework and a date for the first legal sports wagers remains unknown. Meanwhile, the neighbouring states of Iowa and Indiana are both set to have legal sports betting in place before the start of the NFL season. Among the casinos issued a temporary sports betting permit in Indiana is Ameristar Casino in East Chicago, located 5 miles from the Illinois border and 20 miles from downtown Chicago.
Related Articles
Illinois betting handle grows 42.4% in October
Illinois’ sports betting market grew once again in October, with amounts wagered up 42.4% month-over-month to $434.6m, and revenue jumped to $42.2m as the vertical’s…
PA sets new sports and igaming revenue records in November
Pennsylvania broke its sports betting and online gambling revenue records in November, though declining land-based revenue led to a year-on-year drop in the state’s monthly…
Discover more
Chicago Casino Feasibility Study Questions
No progress made
Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot has failed in her latest attempt to secure a tax break for a planned city-owned casino.
She recently visited Springfield, the capital of Illinois, to ask lawmakers to consider easing the current tax scheme that is in place. The reason Lightfoot is seeking such a tax break is due to the results of a feasibility study that was conducted in August.
Outcomes of the feasibility study
The feasibility study was completed by Union Gaming, a Las Vegas-based firm, after being commissioned by the Illinois Gaming Board.
gaming revenue generated at this casino would effectively be subject to a tax rate of 72%
The conclusion of this feasibility study was that casino operators would not have an interest in investing in a casino resort in Chicago due to the hefty tax scheme.
As per the recent gambling expansion bill in the state, the gaming revenue generated at this casino would effectively be subject to a tax rate of 72%.
Mayor Lightfoot is still optimistic
Lightfoot subsequently proposed an amended tax scheme to the Illinois lawmakers, but to no avail.
Speaking about her efforts, Lightfoot said: “We feel like things are moving forward in a positive direction, but we’ve got to get the language finalized and get it to the respective chambers so that legislators can see what the outlines of the legislation look like.”
Breakdown of the current tax scheme
When factoring in all of the various operating expenses associated with a casino, such as utilities, marketing and payroll, Union Gaming believes that with the current tax scheme, a 1% profit is all that could be achieved by a Chicago casino.
However, with the likes of debt servicing, any such profits would be instantly eroded away, which poses a major issue for getting this casino project off the ground.
Union Gaming believes that with the current tax scheme, a 1% profit is all that could be achieved
Chicago Casino Feasibility Study Guides
Despite not making any progress so far, Lightfoot believes that an agreement can be secured. However, with the fall session of the Illinois General Assembly being adjourned today, this issue will have to be parked for some time.
Chicago Casino Feasibility Study Guidelines
Bill signed in July
This new casino was made possible following the signing of the gaming expansion bill in July by Governor J.B. Pritzker. It also gives the green light for the ten riverboat casinos in the state to set up land operations.
Chicago Casino Feasibility Study Guide
As part of this bill, sports betting has also been legalized, with licensing applications set to begin in December.